| |
LSAC Opposes Probation Office
(posted 3.09.09)
A probation office planned for the Lafayette Square Area has now become
a hot spot of neighborhood concerns. The issue caused the City County Administration
and Finance Committee to delay the vote to approve the lease until March
24 to give city officials more time to address neighborhood concerns.
The lease approval also includes a traffic and juvenile court at 3733 Commercial
Drive. A lockup room will also be housed in the office space.
City County Councilor Maggie Lewis explained that the Pike Township Residents
Association and Lafayette Square Area Coalition have not received formal
presentations from Glenn Lawrence, the court administrator, about the exact
details, so residents can know what to expect.
Lewis, who represents the area, said the area is trying to move toward
a district with an international feel and a probation office would not
complement the plan.
"We have a lot of issues over there," she said, noting the coalition
is trying to change the perception. She felt that a probation office would
be a set back to the revitalization efforts and perception image of crime.
"What does that say about our area?" Lewis asked.
At the Feb. 26 LSAC meeting, President Mary Clark embraced the idea of
traffic court coming to the area. She did not view traffic offenders as
criminals, but hoped that they will spend money in the area.
The thought of a probation office has now cast its own negative image in
the minds of the coalition members. Clark, speaking for the coalition members,
contends a probation office would only confirm the perception that it is
not safe to shop in the area. She explained that bringing a probation system
to the area means "that we are accepting that the media is saying
that the crime is bad in the area." She thinks a probation office
will become a "spot light" for crime. "We don't want that
there."
Lawrence said the probation office is needed because of the increase of
clients in that area.
Councilor Ryan Vaughn was not comfortable in voting since Lewis had concerns.
He said that a probation office would assist those in need of service on
the west side instead of making them travel across town. He said the inefficiencies
of location can set probationers up for failure by missing appointments.
The current office is located at 10th and Post Road.
Vaughn talked about jail over crowding. He was concerned that sending probationers
back to jail over unintentional late or missed appointments only compounds
the overcrowding situation and does not help the probationer who is trying
to stay on the right course.
Councilor Jackie Nytes said it important for the city to maintain the facility
in the area and maintain the bar that the LSAC has set to accomplish its
revitalization goals. She requested some type of documentation to show
the citizens that the area is in need of probation service. She does not
believe a probation office will prevent the coalition from accomplishing
its goals as long as the facility is operated at a level of quality that
meets the coalition's standards.
Councilor Marilyn Pfisterer said she would go to public hearings to explain
the probation office and assist with educating the public. "There
are impacts in the neighborhood we all have to be accountable for."
Lawrence explained the relocation costs and some requirements for upfront
funds. $500,000 will be contributed toward the "$988,000 build out",
plus $210,000 for one year's advanced rent. The upfront payments are necessary
because the developer is not comfortable with the city's "non appropriation
clause" in the lease. Rent is expected to be $10.01 square foot for
the 26,254 square foot site. Lawrence thinks he can lower the cost by curtailing
certain areas in housekeeping. The office space is needed to accommodate
the growing traffic court case load. The daily projections are between
900 to 1,000 people going through the system.
|
|